Neuros has long spoken about digital rights and their important roll in innovation. They are rights that have long been under siege from big media. Google, however, has long been a company that we, as Internet users, have invested a great deal of trust in. It's very disappointing, and even more scary to me, to see them, through YouTube, come down on the side of a more proprietary, restricted Internet. Recently they started excluding certain device manufacturers from displaying videos add this to the recent move to give partners more ways to block viewing. These actions are almost certain to stymie innovation and freedom of communication in variety of ways. We can imagine many of those ways, but the saddest of all are the ways we can't imagine which will never be realized because they were blocked from ever seeing the light of day.
Open standards are a practical necessity for innovation. If Google, or anyone else, is picking the winners and losers up front, we can be certain that precious clever ideas will be lost before they ever get a chance to grow, morph and become the next big thing. No one should know this better than the folks at Google and YouTube who once took some of the most unlikely ideas and made them central to our lives. Imagine if Microsoft, IBM or any other entity had been able to act as gatekeeper at the inception of Google and YouTube. I think just about anyone can imagine those services would never have gotten to market. There's nothing whatsoever wrong with Google profiting from YouTube, and we welcome their experimentation in a variety of means to do that, but they need to do so in an open, non discriminatory way that allows small and big entities alike to experiment and innovate.
It goes without saying that I want to see our own Neuros products get a chance at the market, but as an interested citizen I also want to see Boxee, Miro, Moovida and a host of other innovative services, applications and devices make it to market. I want to see a world where we go from being passive consumers of content to active participants in adding our voices to the news of the day. Google needs to quickly decide if they are to be a force that helps accelerate that or impedes it.

Comments
additional thoughts
As I posted to the mailing list:
This is even worse than Hulu blocking Boxee for a few reasons:
1. It's mostly user generated content that YouTube is themselves
blocking, probably in many cases against the wishes of the content
creators
2. It's entirely arbitrary. You may not appreciate that Adobe flash
controls a proprietary standard for web video, but at least they
license it in a non discriminatory way to everyone, Google is actually
picking winners and losers.
3. The Google brand is staked on "doing no evil" and promoting open
standards and open source, if Google can take this kind of position
with no ramifications, well frankly, any brand can do so without fear
of repercussions.
Please view the post and spread the word any way you can. If there's
not a swift and meaningful backlash to this, its going to set a very
unfortunate precedent.
Post new comment