[00:24] <natetrue> JoeyBorn, i made the "Who links here" feature available as a javascript API now
[00:24] <natetrue> so it's just copy and paste to your site and you have linkback tracker too!
[00:24] <natetrue> www.americantechpushers.com |
[00:25] <natetrue> whoa, where did that come from
[00:25] <natetrue> cre.ations.net
[00:38] <JoeyBorn> xorlev, hear that?
[00:45] <Xorlev> JoeyBorn: Hm?
[00:46] <Xorlev> The linkbacks?
[00:47] <JoeyBorn> the who links here feature, have you seen it?
[00:47] <JoeyBorn> it's pretty cool.
[00:48] <Xorlev> Yeah, it's awesome
[00:48] <JoeyBorn> Nate is going to "give it away for free" for a couple years until his patent issues and then extort huge royalties once people embed them all over their sites!
[00:48] <Xorlev> Heh :)
[00:49] <JoeyBorn> I know because I counseled young nate on these evil scheme
[00:49] <JoeyBorn> s/ this evil scheme
[00:50] <GuestN200> joeyborn i was wondering if you have or know where i can get nightly precompiled tarballs as firmwares
[00:50] <Xorlev> I'm guessing you want me to install it on OdNT?
[00:50] <JoeyBorn> Xorlev, I have no idea, how hard is it?
[00:51] <JoeyBorn> GuestN200, there is no "nightly precompiled tarballs"
[00:51] <Xorlev> Probably not too hard, but I don't see much use in individual articles, perhaps one for OdNT in general.
[00:51] <Xorlev> GuestN200: You either have to compile it yourself or wait for the next release
[00:51] <JoeyBorn> we don't have that setup yet, and they would be too frequently broken
[00:51] <Xorlev> trunk :(
[00:51] <Xorlev> Trunk mades devs sad pandas.
[00:52] <JoeyBorn> xorlev, maybe for the wiki?
[00:53] <Xorlev> Possibly...but trackbacks for a wiki? I don't see too much of a point.
[00:53] <JoeyBorn> yea, you have a point.
[00:54] <JoeyBorn> isn't there some kind of trackback feature on drupal already? any idea how that works?
[00:54] <JoeyBorn> I guess my main interest is just knowing myself where the traffic is coming from
[00:55] <Xorlev> It's generally used by bloggers and such. We could always implement AWstats if we wanted to know referrers.
[00:55] <Xorlev> Or Google Analytics. That's pretty neat.
[00:55] <JoeyBorn> something like that would be *great* I have no idea where the traffic is coming from or to what
[00:56] <JoeyBorn> I don't have a clue what people are reading or care about on OdNT.
[00:56] <Xorlev> Hm, well I'll brainstorm on some ideas.
[00:57] <Xorlev> Probably wouldn't be too hard to implement the trackback globally in Drupal
[01:14] <natetrue> just pop it in a template
[01:14] <Xorlev> Yar
[01:15] * Xorlev  puts on to-do list for tomorrow
[01:15] <natetrue> yay!
[01:16] <natetrue> so JoeyBorn, i heard you reference the 'stacks of returned 442s'
[01:16] <natetrue> do you have any big plans for them?
[01:17] <JoeyBorn> not really, why you have any ideas?
[01:17] <natetrue> not immediately
[01:18] <natetrue> i was thinking of trying to convince andru to buy the 442s you're loaning us if you can give us a deal
[01:18] <natetrue> not sure if he'd go for it
[01:19] <natetrue> anyhow, we'll talk next week :)
[01:49] <crweb> JoeyBorn: I could use one
[01:49] <crweb> ;)
[01:55] <JoeyBorn> natetrue, that'd be cool.
[01:55] <JoeyBorn> natetrue, that'd be cool
[02:12] * nerochia1o  yawns, mornings, and the winter vacations are officially over
[02:53] <crweb> nerochiaro: almost got an ipod ish audio app running
[02:53] <crweb> i'm using mplayer right now to play files. Just have to hook it up to nmsd
[02:53] <nerochiaro> crweb: you're good. i did almost nothing these days :(
[02:54] <crweb> nerochiaro: www.limesg.com
[02:54] <nerochiaro> mplayer locally i imagine ?
[02:54] <crweb> thats the "while playing" window
[02:54] <crweb> nerochiaro: yeah
[02:54] <crweb> just for testing the database, filenames, tag info, etc
[02:55] <nerochiaro> crweb: that's a form designer screenshot ?
[02:56] <crweb> yeah
[02:56] <crweb> heres a real one:
[02:57] <crweb> nerochiaro: www.limesg.com
[02:58] <nerochiaro> well, as a screenshot is not that great, but i get the point :)
[02:58] <crweb> pulls out of txt database, never touches the files, or slow bash output
[02:59] <crweb> sqlite database
[02:59] <crweb> and only updates the screen where the draw occurs
[02:59] <crweb> very fast
[02:59] <nerochiaro> well, the "only update on draw" is basics
[03:00] <nerochiaro> the rest is good. who updates the db ?
[03:00] <nerochiaro> you have to do it manually ?
[03:00] <crweb> you do. under settings you set the Collections Folders, and hit scan
[03:00] <nerochiaro> ok
[03:01] <crweb> and you can also switch to a network sql server
[03:01] <crweb> so db isn't on slow disc at all
[03:02] <nerochiaro> that's all provided by qt's abstraction, no ?
[03:02] <crweb> yep
[03:02] <crweb> it took some tinkering
[03:02] <crweb> cause sqlite is different than postgres and mysql
[03:03] <crweb> but I got the tables generic enough
[03:04] <nerochiaro> as long as you don't do complex queries
[03:04] <crweb> I'll be adding ftp, and http support
[03:04] <crweb> to "stream" from http and ftp
[03:04] <crweb> there'll be some cheating in that. but yeah
[03:04] <crweb> I'm liking it so far
[03:04] <crweb> ipod simplistic
[03:05] <nerochiaro> in quotes since you don't do streaming but download and play locally ?
[03:05] <crweb> not a full download, I'll probably go in 200k blocks
[03:05] <nerochiaro> ok, but you still feed a single existing file to the media api
[03:05] <crweb> yes
[03:06] <nerochiaro> should work if network is good enough, but if it ever comes past the point where you have data, then i think the media server won't wait and will stop.
[03:07] <Ycros> you can feed it silence
[03:07] <nerochiaro> /dev/zero ?
[03:08] <Ycros> uhm, I think you'd have to be intelligent about codec block boundaries
[03:08] <crweb> Ycros: you don't have to worry to much about mpeg
[03:08] <crweb> which is why mpeg is so nice
[03:08] <crweb> it "is" a stream
[03:08] <nerochiaro> well, right, still have to write zero frames to the disk though, so it will eat space anyway
[03:08] <crweb> but yes, lots of care
[03:08] <nerochiaro> space for silence
[03:09] <Ycros> what are we writing to the disk?
[03:09] <crweb> Ycros: the api doesn't allow streams
[03:09] <crweb> Ycros: you write to disc to fake a stream
[03:10] <crweb> means you also fake filesize
[03:10] <crweb> by writing zero's
[03:10] <nerochiaro> if the server tells you that
[03:10] <crweb> I'm still working on my method
[03:10] <Ycros> I lack a context for this conversation, I have no idea what you're working on
[03:11] <crweb> nerochiaro: theres a frame in idv2 to get the filesize
[03:11] <nerochiaro> Ycros: writing his own player for the OSD
[03:11] <Ycros> right
[03:11] <crweb> not that its always right
[03:11] <nerochiaro> crweb: which most people won't use probably
[03:11] <Ycros> you're talking about the media api which uses the dsp?
[03:11] <nerochiaro> Ycros: yep, that doesn't support streaming
[03:13] <crweb> i haven't even started looking at the nms api
[03:13] <crweb> just been doing my sql and window ordering
[03:14] <crweb> 187k
[03:15] <crweb> sqldatabase for 115 tracks is 137k
[03:15] <crweb> I'll have a lot of cleaning to do
[03:15] <crweb> soon as it gets usable
[03:16] <crweb> I have some duplicate information in the db
[03:16] <crweb> album names, artist names, are all repeated for every track, instead of int's
[03:17] <crweb> nerochiaro: i can't wait for the IR changes
[03:17] <nerochiaro> crweb: but the hell out of Gao then
[03:17] <crweb> nerochiaro: I'll be almost ready to start major testing
[03:17] <nerochiaro> er, "bug the hell" i mean
[03:18] <nerochiaro> he's holding these for review
[03:18] <crweb> how is the Neuros gui looking?
[03:18] <nerochiaro> what do you mean ?
[03:18] <crweb> I haven't actually booted my OSD in a very long time
[03:18] <crweb> just been writing
[03:19] <nerochiaro> didn't try .40 but i guess it didn't change much
[03:19] <Ycros> sqlite is awesome
[03:19] <crweb> the real qtopia was released a few days ago.
[03:19] <crweb> with phone support, helixplayer, and all kinds of stuff
[03:19] <Ycros> nice
[03:19] <crweb> ah, wireless device support
[03:19] <nerochiaro> it's licensed as plain GPL rihgt ?
[03:19] <crweb> yep
[03:19] <crweb> first time ever
[03:20] <crweb> qtopia-core was just qt4
[03:20] <nerochiaro> that's nice
[03:20] <crweb> this is qtopia commercial turned gpl
[03:20] <Ycros> nice.
[03:21] <crweb> the Archos PMA400 runs qtopia 4.2.0
[03:23] <crweb> well, bed time for tonight
[03:24] <nerochiaro> have a nice rest
[03:24] <crweb> i think writing a jukbox in 36 hours deserves at least some sleep
[03:24] <nerochiaro> no sleeping since 36 hours ?
[03:25] <crweb> i got excited
[03:25] <nerochiaro> and you have lots of time in your hands too :)
[03:25] <crweb> yeah for 3 more weeks :)
[03:25] <nerochiaro> don't waste it relaxing like i did
[03:26] <crweb> yeah i did vacations and weddings pre-christmas
[03:26] <nerochiaro> weddings ?
[03:26] <crweb> friends weddings
[03:26] <nerochiaro> ah, ok
[04:45] <suma> hi all, i have put the asterisk for download for the OSD
[04:46] <suma> nathanstores.com
[04:46] <suma> if anyone have any feedback on its working do let me know
[04:46] <suma> i will share the source soon
[09:39] <ymo000> JoeBorn, ping
[10:10] <crweb> nerochiaro: how can i get ahold of your ir patches? I think I'm ready
[10:17] <nerochiaro> crweb: until gao gives green light to releases them you can use the userspace driver in svn.neurosaudio.com
[10:18] <nerochiaro> crweb: it's a bit old, but if you have any problems let me know
[10:18] <crweb> how did you choose which keys to bind to which buttons?
[10:19] <nerochiaro> it's completely arbitrary. you can change it in the source. final driver will support remapping via ioctl, so you don't have to recompile everytime
[10:20] <crweb> does anyone have benchmarks on how Xeon performes compared to Core Duo and Pentium 4?
[10:22] <vmarks> which xeon? which p4?
[10:22] <crweb> lets say a Xeon 2.67 EM64T vrs Pentium 4 2.6 northwood
[10:23] <crweb> P-4 2.8 northwood
[10:24] <crweb> I'm trying to deside if I wat to go dual xeon, or Core Duo for my new dev box
[10:24] <crweb> a dev box, that might play a few games every now and then
[10:27] <crweb> tomshardware.com doesn't ever really do server cpu's much
[10:29] <crweb> when they do, the compare to other server cpu's, not "desktop" cpu's
[10:47] <nerochiaro> crweb: tried that driver yet ?
[10:48] <crweb> nerochiaro: no, still building
[10:48] <nerochiaro> k, no problem
[10:48] <crweb> updating, plugging the osd in, etc
[10:49] <nerochiaro> i think i'll update post-ces next time
[10:50] <nerochiaro> is it just me or the OSD seems to take some time to "warm up" during which it shows very fuzzy on composite output, then progressively gets better with time ?
[10:52] <crweb> mine makes these large black spots
[10:52] <crweb> "dark" spots
[10:52] <crweb> always on the right of the screen
[10:53] <nerochiaro> hmm, here it's like the image is shaking a lot, very frequent shakes, but only 1-2 pixel wide at most
[10:53] <nerochiaro> just enough to make everythign blurry
[10:53] <crweb> could be the tv too
[10:53] <nerochiaro> possibly. but it's my monitor, which is basically always on
[10:54] <nerochiaro> maybe it's some problem with cables
[10:54] <nerochiaro> it doesn't always happen
[10:56] <crweb> crap.. i just wasted an hour shopping
[10:57] <crweb> my desktop is right in the performance grey area
[10:57] <nerochiaro> what do you mean with grey area ?
[10:57] <crweb> the low end Core Duo 2's in my price range, don't outperform my pentium 4 3.0 northwood
[10:58] <crweb> its the overlap
[10:58] <crweb> where the low end of the new line, is lower than the average performance of the old line
[10:59] <nerochiaro> so you are better off keeping what you have
[10:59] <crweb> yeah
[10:59] <crweb> means I have to wait longer
[10:59] <crweb> I've had this thing for 2 years though
[11:00] <nerochiaro> it's amazing how long i'm still feeling comfortable with this old athlon 1.7 i have. i don't feel any need to upgrade it at the moment
[11:01] <crweb> i'm the same
[11:01] <crweb> every once and a while i'll start shopping
[11:01] <crweb> just to see, and then just lose interest
[11:02] <nerochiaro> heh, i use to do that from time to time to. but hasn't happened in a while (monitor aside9
[11:02] <crweb> I want extremely fast build times
[11:03] <crweb> which is why i was thinking dual xeon
[11:03] <nerochiaro> that helps, but be sure you are not constrained by disk access or other factors
[11:03] <nerochiaro> before you shell out money for a new cpu
[11:03] <crweb> i'm all sata, and sata2
[11:03] <crweb> i have a really nice motherboard. makes parting with it very hard
[11:04] <crweb> 6 ide 133, 4 sata, gigabit, 8 firewire, 8 usb
[11:04] <nerochiaro> still make sure the bottleneck in your compilations is really the cpu
[11:04] <crweb> 2 gigs of PC400.
[11:04] <crweb> yeah, i probably could use some nicer drives
[11:05] <nerochiaro> what do you do with 6 ide ? there's not even the space in the case for all that stuff
[11:05] <crweb> you can have 6 individual, or 4, and 2 raid
[11:05] <crweb> I'm not using them
[11:05] <crweb> but I'd love to turn it into a server
[11:06] <nerochiaro> for serving what ?
[11:06] <crweb> I've got 2.5TB in a firewire array
[11:06] <crweb> could put some of those internal
[11:06] <crweb> I have a recording studio
[11:06] <nerochiaro> crweb: would they fit ?
[11:06] <crweb> they would in my server case :)
[11:07] <crweb> 20 drive bays
[11:07] <nerochiaro> watch out for noise at that point
[11:07] <crweb> there is a dual p3-866 in the case right now
[11:07] <crweb> shouldn't be any different than the firewire ;)
[11:08] <crweb> i went firewire cause each unit has its own cooling though
[11:08] <crweb> i was losing drives faster than I could buy them
[11:08] <crweb> after i gave them all their own cooling, never had a drive fail since
[11:09] <nerochiaro> either you have very hot drivers or you have a very hot environment.
[11:09] <nerochiaro> most drives don't need own cooling
[11:09] <crweb> yeah, i dunno
[11:10] <crweb> internal case temp never got over 42C
[11:11] <nerochiaro> strange
[11:11] <crweb> they can get pretty hot
[11:11] <crweb> even idle
[11:12] <nerochiaro> speaking of noise, one of my silent fans is failing, it's making an horrible noise. need to single out which one and then replace it. what an annoyance
[11:13] <crweb> got to love those silent noisy fans
[11:13] <nerochiaro> heh
[11:13] <nerochiaro> noisy silent fans, more
[11:13] <crweb> ooh. right right
[11:13] <nerochiaro> they served me very well for over an year, i can't really fault one of them for dying now
[11:14] <crweb> I've got to swap out the video fan on my tablet
[11:14] <nerochiaro> that thing probably whines a lot, being small
[11:15] <crweb> its no so much a whine as it is, a click
[11:15] <nerochiaro> fell slightly out of axis probably
[11:37] <ymo000> crweb, have you tried the latest fmw and downgrade to a prev version yet ?
[11:39] <ymo000> anyone feels like the making of the upk should be part of the build scripts ?
[11:39] <crweb> it should not no
[11:39] <ymo000> crweb, pray tell why not ?
[11:39] <crweb> as said before, it can damage if not handled correctly
[11:39] <nerochiaro> ymo000: you can include different things in the upk
[11:40] <nerochiaro> ymo000: not everyone will like the defaults
[11:40] <ymo000> crweb, thats why if it is done (tested) by someone in the know the script will automate it
[11:40] <crweb> making a upk is straght forward and easy
[11:40] <nerochiaro> crweb: but if you don't include the bootloader, there's not much damange
[11:40] <crweb> ymo000: ?
[11:40] <crweb> ymo000: you don't need a upk for nfs booting
[11:41] <crweb> ymo000: and just because you packed it, doesn't mean its ready for r/o cramfs
[11:41] <ymo000> crweb, exactly .. the booting via nfs is not working for me now
[11:41] <crweb> nothing is working for you
[11:41] <crweb> how would your custom upk help?
[11:41] <crweb> when the officials don't work?
[11:42] <crweb> use the one joe posted last night
[11:42] <crweb> .40
[11:42] <ymo000> yes ... my only hope is that i get a newer upk and the thing start loading it. if someone can help verify that you can downgrade from .34 to .30 i will stop blaming .34
[11:42] <crweb> move on
[11:42] <crweb> just get something to work
[11:43] <ymo000> crweb, he posted on the wiki or the irc ?
[11:43] <ymo000> i still have my logs of the irc
[11:43] <crweb> if it won't boot cramfs then it probably won't boot nfs
[11:43] <nerochiaro> ymo000: what would prevent downgrading ?
[11:43] <crweb> nerochiaro: filesystem change
[11:43] <nerochiaro> crweb: you mean partition table ?
[11:43] <crweb> nerochiaro: they up'd the flash to 14mb and rw to 1mb
[11:43] <ymo000> nerochiaro, the thing keeps saying invalid pkg ..
[11:44] <crweb> though I don't think its related to his problem
[11:44] <crweb> he's either a total moron, or has a broken unit ;)
[11:44] <ymo000> crweb, it is a problem tho right ?
[11:44] <crweb> that was a joke btw
[11:44] <ymo000> crweb, that not very nice :(
[11:44] <nerochiaro> crweb: why do you say he has a broken unit ?
[11:45] <crweb> cause it won't even boot the good firmware
[11:45] <nerochiaro> what is the good firmware ?
[11:45] <ymo000> i have my little finger telling me something awful hapened in .34
[11:45] <crweb> any of the neuros released
[11:46] <crweb> ymo000: find 0.40
[11:46] <nerochiaro> ymo000: i run .35 and it's happy
[11:46] <ymo000> .34 is actually the one i have on there right now
[11:46] <crweb> it was a link at about 2 am
[11:46] <crweb> ymo000: move on, forget .34
[11:46] <ymo000> nerochiaro, where you get the .35 from ???
[11:46] <nerochiaro> ymo000: i built it ;)
[11:47] <ymo000> .34 is the latest bin fmw i have seen
[11:47] <nerochiaro> .40 is out, i think
[11:47] <ymo000> nerochiaro, i have built upward from .30 to .47 which was releazed yesterday .. and it reboots at the same point again and again
[11:47] <crweb> ok
[11:47] <nerochiaro> ymo000: but it did that even before ?
[11:48] <crweb> we aren't worried about building, till you actually get a neuros firmware to boot
[11:48] <ymo000> nerochiaro, when i had the old fmw it would boot from the flash
[11:48] <nerochiaro> ymo000: which old one ?
[11:48] <crweb> forget that you can even build. and get the unit functioning
[11:48] <ymo000> nerochiaro, the one that came on the unit .. i dont know the version of it
[11:48] <nerochiaro> ymo000: oh, ok
[11:49] <nerochiaro> ymo000: then after that you put on .47 immediately, and it stopped booting
[11:49] <nerochiaro> ymo000: right ?
[11:49] <ymo000> nerochiaro, whe i say .47 i mean the svn tag ...
[11:49] <nerochiaro> ymo000: yes
[11:50] <ymo000> nerochiaro, i tried nfs booting using .40 .47 and even trunk
[11:50] <chreekat> sourcerror: Did you make it to LUGOD's meeting last night? I was unfortunately at work until 19.30. :-/
[11:50] <ymo000> nerochiaro, then i was told maybe is because i have an old fmw on the unit
[11:50] <nerochiaro> ymo000: did you try cramfs_boot (normal flash boot) with .40 or .47 ?
[11:50] <ymo000> nerochiaro, so i went with .34 the latest bin fmw ...
[11:51] <ymo000> nerochiaro, i never got .40 or .47 to boot over nfs
[11:51] <nerochiaro> no, not over nfs. i want to know if you did get it to boot *without nfs* with .40 or .47
[11:51] <crweb> ymo000: the firmware on the unit does not effect booting
[11:52] <nerochiaro> crweb: i think with "booting" he means also the kernel
[11:52] <ymo000> nerochiaro, so when i went to .34 .. it keeps rebooting at the same place .47 and .40 did over nfs
[11:52] <crweb> nerochiaro: thats what i've been trying to get him to do, but hes stuck with this .34 thing
[11:52] <nerochiaro> ymo000: did you get my previous question ? did you manage to boot without nfs on .40 or .47 ?
[11:53] <crweb> ymo000: forget that nfs exists. Flash with neuros's upk for 0.40 or 0.47 and see if the unit works.
[11:53] <ymo000> nerochiaro, mmm ... how do i get .40 or .47 on the flash ?
[11:53] <ymo000> crweb, ok .. where are the .40 and .47 upk ?
[11:54] <nerochiaro> ymo000: open.neurostechnology.com
[11:54] <nerochiaro> whoops
[11:54] <ymo000> i have not tried building them myself .. at the fear of bricking the thing
[11:54] <nerochiaro> sorry, wrong link
[11:54] <crweb> ymo000: you'll have to check your log
[11:54] <nerochiaro> ymo000: don't build
[11:54] <crweb> oh wait.
[11:54] <crweb> i'm an admin, i could just go look
[11:54] <crweb> open.neurostechnology.com
[11:54] <crweb> heh...
[11:55] <nerochiaro> crweb: where's .40 though ?
[11:55] <ymo000> crweb, you realize the Unofficial firmware (3.27-0.46) is the one evryone is loading thinking they are loading .34 ?
[11:56] <ymo000> the links are the same !!!
[11:56] <crweb> nerochiaro: he never posted it
[11:56] <crweb> ymo000: LOAD it
[11:56] <crweb> ymo000: BOOT it
[11:56] <ymo000> the link to .up *is* he same !
[11:56] <nerochiaro> crweb: ymo000 is right though. the link IS the same
[11:56] <nerochiaro> open.neurostechnology.com
[11:56] <ymo000> crweb, thats exactly what i have now .. i was thinking i had .34 all along
[11:56] <nerochiaro> both for unofficial and for .34
[11:56] <nerochiaro> crweb: check it
[11:57] <ymo000> someone made a booboo somewhere
[11:57] <nerochiaro> we should really change one of them. it was overwritten
[11:57] <nerochiaro> then we should pull off the .34 post or restore the link
[11:57] <crweb> Joe must have done that last night
[11:57] <crweb> its because they are using the form file posting
[11:58] <crweb> dang
[11:58] <crweb> the file being offered is 0.46
[11:58] <crweb> 0.34 was overwr