[00:58] <GuestN244> hi
[00:58] <daurnimator> hi.
[00:59] <GuestN244> how do i get the neuros osd to see ntfs winxp shares have you had luck with it yet (im using .69 firmware) and i have droped my firewall and enabled the messenger service against my better jugment!
[01:00] <GuestN244> wont even see the fat32 shares ether
[01:00] <daurnimator> have you read the issue on the ML/wiki?
[01:00] <GuestN244> ?
[01:01] <GuestN244> no
[01:01] <GuestN244> iv been trying to get info on it all night
[01:01] <daurnimator> i've seen titles of pages that mention problems with XP shares
[01:02] * daurnimator  searches
[01:04] <daurnimator> comments.gmane.org
[01:04] <daurnimator> crweb: care to comment?
[01:05] <GuestN244> i will take a look
[01:06] <daurnimator> see this: open.neurostechnology.com
[01:06] <daurnimator> though that may already be in 0.69
[01:07] <daurnimator> seems it has
[01:07] <daurnimator> GuestN244: you sure you're on .69?
[01:08] <daurnimator> here: open.neurostechnology.com
[01:08] <daurnimator> "Firmware- Networking and Streaming - Can support Windows 2000 and Linux and also can support Windows XP if you set the shared folder’s permissions as Everyone. OSD slows-down when is in samba if network is disconnected suddenly, and OSD stalls if network is disconnected when playing/recording video in Samba"
[01:14] <crweb> well
[01:14] <crweb> considering the fact that when you are playing/recording video to a network device
[01:14] <crweb> and you just unplug it... wtf do you think is going to happen?
[01:14] <crweb> shared folders permissions default as everyone
[01:16] <crweb> thats all just common logic
[01:16] <crweb> what happens when you pull a card out while its being recorded to?
[01:16] <crweb> which still is very different
[01:16] <GuestN244> yes i have .69 i flashed tonight and verifyed in properties on osd
[01:17] <crweb> you get a "hey, card was pulled out" from the kernel if a card is pulled out
[01:17] <crweb> there is no, "hey, network cable was unplugged", fromt he kernel
[01:18] <crweb> i'm all for usability and stuff, but there is a point where a user is just going to have to use his/her brain
[01:18] <GuestN244> also im able to ftp in with crwebs ftp server trick!
[01:19] <crweb> you can't take a dvd out while its playing and it still play, and you can't eject a vcr tape out while the vcr is recording
[01:19] <crweb> GuestN244: congrats :)
[01:20] <GuestN244> thanx crweb but it would be nice if the new firmware saw my xp shares now so i can have both options
[01:20] <crweb> GuestN244: that is a bug that is being worked on
[01:21] <GuestN244> your the man! i dont know how you can code so fast with results
[01:21] <crweb> GuestN244: and actually, its a bug with windows xp
[01:21] <GuestN244> ah
[01:21] <GuestN244> i bet vista is even more of a bitch
[01:21] <crweb> well, maybe,maybe not
[01:21] <crweb> microsoft linked XP name announcing to the windows messenger service
[01:22] <crweb> which they disabled in XP SP2 to stop messanger service virus from spreading everywhere
[01:22] <crweb> why these 2 unrelated items depend on eachother, no one knows
[01:22] <GuestN244> vista has many versions and the lower versions have the inability to log on to domains!
[01:23] <crweb> GuestN244: nothing new there
[01:23] <crweb> GuestN244: only XP Pro can login to domains
[01:23] <GuestN244> well i had the messenger service runing and i still had no luck
[01:23] <GuestN244> ah i only have xp pros in the building1
[01:23] <crweb> you have messanger service enabled?
[01:23] <crweb> why?
[01:25] <crweb> some XP machines can't even see XP machines
[01:25] <GuestN244> not now but when i was testing the osd .69 to see if it works i did on one of my junk boxes
[01:25] <crweb> ah
[01:25] <crweb> well there is more to it than that
[01:25] <crweb> it will be fixed soon
[01:25] <GuestN244> i had that problem with the xp not seeing xp with my laptop but it has cured since a win update about 2 months ago~
[01:26] <crweb> I have to go to bed, happy hacking :)
[01:27] <GuestN244> in one of the articals i read it said osd should show up in mshome workgroup but no luck ither
[01:27] <crweb> no
[01:27] <crweb> thats my firmware
[01:27] <GuestN244> night crweb
[01:27] <GuestN244> ah i am mistaken
[01:27] <crweb> I'll be releasing a 0.69 version of the NAS server version soon
[01:27] <GuestN244> they have to get your stuff intagrated!
[01:27] <crweb> one that flashes without all the hassle for sure
[01:28] <GuestN244> nice
[01:28] <crweb> open.neurostechnology.com
[01:28] <crweb> I don't recommend doing it though
[01:28] <crweb> just wait for the update
[01:28] <GuestN244> i will
[01:29] <crweb> not that its broken
[01:29] <GuestN244> but im going to read the info
[01:29] <crweb> its just that the flash stuff was fixed
[01:29] <crweb> and there will only be 1 step to take in the next flash version
[01:29] <crweb> night for real this time :)
[01:30] <GuestN244> haha night
[01:54] <GuestN244> ir blaster works in this release it changed my samsung tv to channel 22 sweet!
[03:16] * nerochiaro  mornings everyone
[08:19] <michaelrose357> hello
[08:20] <nerochiaro> hey
[08:21] <michaelrose357> anyone know of another mp3 player besides neuros that syncs well under linux software?
[08:22] <nerochiaro> hmm sorry, i don't know
[11:57] <nerochiaro> JoeBorn: hi, you around ?
[12:11] <crweb> hi
[13:30] <sgomes> hey everyone
[13:31] <chreekat> hi sgomes
[13:31] <sgomes> chreekat: hi
[13:32] <sgomes> lots of news in neurosland, hehe
[13:35] <JoeBorn> I'm here now
[13:43] <JoshMalone> Hey joe
[13:43] <JoeBorn> hey JoshMalone, long time no see, how are things?
[13:43] <JoshMalone> okay. I need to ge tmy OSD out of mothballs and try the new software
[13:44] <JoshMalone> I'm like 4 releases behind since I last tortured mine
[13:45] <JoeBorn> yeah, we've been getting the releases fast and furious.
[13:45] <JoeBorn> in fact, we have .72 out now
[13:49] <JoeBorn> open.neurostechnology.com
[13:49] <JoeBorn> if someone can give that link a shot.
[13:50] <chreekat> downloading
[13:50] <chreekat> seems fine
[13:50] <JoshMalone> fine here, 2
[13:52] <JoshMalone> I'll try installing it tonite
[14:27] <JoeBorn> I've actually got a backlog of stuff on OdNT
[14:27] <JoeBorn> I've got a waterproof OSD for windsurfing
[14:27] <JoeBorn> I've got an OSD on some kind of space mission
[14:27] <JoeBorn> OSD on police bikes
[14:28] <Coderjoe|work> wow
[14:32] <JoeBorn> OSD's stuck on the snouts of pig as they are running through the herd
[14:32] <JoeBorn> (ok, I just made that one up)
[14:33] <cr-tablet> did i miss something?
[14:33] <cr-tablet> I don't think pigs herd... so, change that to hurd, double funny
[14:39] <Coderjoe|work> except the OSD isn't running hurd
[14:39] <cr-tablet> it wouldn't be running through the hurd if it was, it would be part of the hurd
[14:40] <cr-tablet> yeah.. i dunno...
[14:40] * cr-tablet  is grasping at straws
[14:40] <cr-tablet> I laughed... thats what matters
[14:41] <JoeBorn> I'm not much the wordsmith as derobert is fond of pointing out.
[14:42] <cr-tablet> crweb, vanish
[14:42] <crweb> mmm.. that was an unexpected result..
[14:49] <nerochiaro> crweb: hi, i had to step out. were you looking for me ?
[14:49] <crweb> not that I can remember
[14:49] <nerochiaro> ah ok
[14:50] <crweb> for the past 2 weeks my alarm clock has been set to the wrong time
[14:50] <crweb> i've been going to bed at 2 on my pc. and getting up ath 7 on my alarm clock
[14:50] <crweb> which, was actually 5:30
[14:50] <nerochiaro> man, and it took you 2 days to notice ?
[14:50] <crweb> then I'd fall back asleep and miss everything
[14:51] <nerochiaro> sometimes happens to me too. i turn off the alarm, wake up and didn't recall turning it off
[14:51] <crweb> well, I would be way to tired so I'd lay back down and fall asleep again, waking back up at 11am
[14:51] <crweb> which 11am is after all my classes and stuff
[14:51] <crweb> but, it would be 11am on my pc
[14:52] <crweb> i wouldn't look at the clock again, till it went off in the morning
[14:52] <crweb> I dunno how long it has been going on
[14:52] <crweb> it explains some things though.. like being to tired to fucntion in the morning, turning off the alarm and waking up way late
[14:54] <nerochiaro> weird stuff is you regularly forget
[14:55] <JoeBorn> I use my cell phone for an alarm clock when I'm in xiamen and it's a horrendous alarm clock
[14:55] <JoeBorn> get a text message at night and the alarm won't sound for example
[14:56] <crweb> JoeBorn: thats how I found out
[14:56] <crweb> JoeBorn: my dad called me right after my alarm (that i set for 9am yesterday) went off
[14:56] <nerochiaro> JoeBorn: my old phone had an alarm clock that won't work if the phone is off. and if i left the phone on, it would lose battery midway through the night. genius
[14:56] <crweb> JoeBorn: i looked at my phone and it said 78:15
[14:56] <crweb> 7:15
[14:59] <crweb> nerochiaro: thats him (shirour) with the cown compiled driver
[14:59] <shirour> hi
[14:59] <crweb> long time no see
[15:00] <shirour> yeah... it has been hectic lately
[15:00] <shirour> how are you? congr. for the prize!
[15:00] <crweb> shirour: ah, yeah. I keep forgetting about that
[15:00] <crweb> heh
[15:00] <nerochiaro> shirour: hi. i was wondering if you can send me the .ko of the framebuffer driver you guys use on the mrobe
[15:00] <crweb> anyway, have you still got that fb driver built?
[15:01] <shirour> nerochiaro: currently it's compiled into the source.
[15:01] <shirour> i can send you the sources instead
[15:01] <nerochiaro> into the source of the kernel ?
[15:01] <shirour> yes
[15:01] <crweb> shirour: yes please.
[15:01] <nerochiaro> yes, send them then, that would help much
[15:01] <crweb> if i give you a login, you can upload it to me
[15:01] <shirour> ok. what are you guys doing?
[15:01] <nerochiaro> quite well, thanks
[15:02] <shirour> what do you need the sources for anyway?
[15:02] <crweb> nerochiaro: that would be "how"
[15:02] <shirour> and why don't you just use the original from cowon?
[15:02] <nerochiaro> no, thanks was for the drivers
[15:02] <crweb> oh i see
[15:03] <nerochiaro> we need it since the one from ingenient we have is very bad
[15:03] <crweb> shirour: the cowon source is 2.6.5
[15:03] <nerochiaro> you can't basically change resolutions with the one we use
[15:03] <crweb> shirour: i have a patched/updated 2.6.15 that you gave me, but not all the source
[15:03] <crweb> aka.. i can't exactly figure out how to compile it
[15:03] <nerochiaro> same here
[15:03] <crweb> well.. actually its a time issue
[15:04] <crweb> don't have any, need some, can't waste any
[15:04] <nerochiaro> it's just easier if we get the one you have and you're sure it builds
[15:04] <shirour> no problem. i'll give you the sources
[15:05] <crweb> can you sftp?
[15:05] <shirour> yes
[15:06] <crweb> shirour: i already have cowonfb.c
[15:06] <crweb> shirour: i need your full source/how you got it to build
[15:06] <Dark_Aurel> Hi all!
[15:06] <crweb> shirour: quads.vwords.com shirour/sh1234
[15:06] <nerochiaro> Dark_Aurel: hej
[15:07] <shirour> crweb: this cowonfb.c has some changes
[15:07] <Dark_Aurel> nerochiaro, hi! how r u?
[15:07] <nerochiaro> Dark_Aurel: pretty sleepy, sore neck, but nothing a good night of rest can't fix
[15:08] <crweb> shirour: firewall blocks dcc
[15:08] <nerochiaro> crweb: you can dcc it here if you want
[15:08] <crweb> yeah, send it to nerochiaro
[15:08] <Dark_Aurel> Does anyone worked with boost::function library?...
[15:09] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: have yes
[15:09] <crweb> I perfer qt
[15:09] <crweb> same concept
[15:09] <crweb> both qt4-console and boost are extention/replacements for stdlib
[15:09] <shirour> nerochiaro: dcc it is
[15:09] <Dark_Aurel> crweb, does there any way to compare 2 boost::function objects?
[15:10] <shirour> crweb: in order to build it put it in drivers/video, edit the kconfig & makefile, run meun-config and select it, and then rebuild your kernel
[15:10] <nerochiaro> shirour: one second and i'll accept that dcc
[15:11] <shirour> ok
[15:11] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: boost::function objects aren't really objects
[15:11] <shirour> crweb: where did you have problems with building the driver?
[15:11] <Dark_Aurel> crweb, explain, pls...
[15:11] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: i believe its more of an api/interface
[15:13] <shirour> crweb, nerochiaro: i'll just paste it in pastebin
[15:13] <Dark_Aurel> crweb, hm... boost::function has state so i think there should be way to compare them...
[15:13] <shirour> pastebin.ca
[15:14] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: they are just templates
[15:14] <crweb> www.boost.org
[15:14] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: it wraps an object
[15:15] <crweb> they will never be equal
[15:15] <shirour> did you get the file?
[15:15] <crweb> unless they point to the same exact thing
[15:15] <Dark_Aurel> So...
[15:15] <nerochiaro> shirour: so it's just this ? pastebin.ca
[15:15] <Dark_Aurel> I have boost::function<void (int)> f1(somefunc);
[15:16] <shirour> nerochiaro: yes
[15:16] <Dark_Aurel> and boost::function< void (int) > f2(somefunc2);
[15:16] <Dark_Aurel> i just need to know is f1 binded to the same function to f2.
[15:17] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: they can't be equal. unless one is just an alias/pointer to the other
[15:17] <shirour> crweb, nerochiaro: do you need help inserting it to the kernel?
[15:17] <crweb> shirour: yes he does
[15:17] <Dark_Aurel> crweb, ok. i see...
[15:18] <crweb> I did it once, but can't remember
[15:18] <shirour> no problem.
[15:18] <nerochiaro> shirour: i try what you said above. if i have problems i'll ask you, thanks
[15:18] <shirour> ok
[15:18] * nerochiaro  goes trying
[15:19] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: the thing is, they don't exist after compile
[15:19] <shirour> we had to change cowon's driver a bit in order to make it a bit more general purpose
[15:19] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: you can't compair themb because they dont' actually exist
[15:19] <crweb> brb
[15:20] <shirour> brb
[15:25] <crweb> if you are in the united states and want some higher performance, I'm selling an intel p4 2.8ghz cpu for $80
[15:27] <crweb> actually, nvrmind. I can't sell it for what it is selling for new
[15:27] <JoeBorn> crweb, i'm setting up a NAS I bought a while ago, and it is sheer misery
[15:27] <JoeBorn> your OSD NAS is definately going to be the way to go.
[15:28] <crweb> JoeBorn: what kind?
[15:28] <crweb> JoeyBorn: I'll try to update it to the newest firmware tonight
[15:28] <JoeBorn> well, I have two, an NSLU2
[15:28] <JoeBorn> and a coolmax something or rather.
[15:29] <JoeBorn> I'm trying to use the coolmax because it's got an enclosure for an internal HD which I like, but holy smokes is it miserable.
[15:29] <JoeBorn> tell it to scan the drive adn it drops the network connection, now it's been at it for an hour
[15:29] <JoeBorn> with just a blinking red and green light.
[15:30] <JoeBorn> who knows what that means. I'm tempted to whip it across the room and show it who's boss.
[15:30] <crweb> that would show it
[15:30] <nerochiaro> stomp on it too
[15:32] <Dark_Aurel> crweb, why don't they exist? instances of it has size, so i think they exist;)
[15:33] <srobs> nerochiaro: any luck..?
[15:35] <nerochiaro> srobs: i need to know how it's defined in kconfig for you
[15:35] <JoeBorn> srobertson, the wayward son returns
[15:35] <nerochiaro> JoeBorn: i'm not sure he's him. i think it's shirour
[15:35] <nerochiaro> srobs: are you shirour ?
[15:36] <JoeBorn> oh, well it doesn't really matter anyway, just IRC smalltalk anyway
[15:36] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: no, they don't exist, they are a language structure
[15:37] <nerochiaro> JoeBorn: :)
[15:37] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: boost::function is a template class
[15:38] <shirour> nerochiaro: yeah.. sorry...
[15:38] <shirour> nerochiaro: what do you need to know?
[15:38] <Dark_Aurel> crweb, so what?... boost::function is template, but boost::function< void (int) > is class.
[15:38] <nerochiaro> in kconfig, how is the item for the fbdriver defined ?
[15:38] <shirour> just copy an exist video driver and change the file name to the cowons
[15:40] <nerochiaro> shirour: no, i need to know also the "depends on" and "select" items
[15:40] <Dark_Aurel> crweb, or i'm wrong?... I can create instances concreate boost::function's, for example boost::function< void (int) >...
[15:43] <shirour> nerochiaro - pastebin.ca
[15:44] <shirour> and "obj-$(CONFIG_FB_COWON) += cowonfb.o"
[15:44] <shirour> in the makefile
[15:46] <nerochiaro> shirour: trying now
[15:46] <shirour> ok
[15:47] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: I will read some and see if I can explain it better later
[15:48] <Dark_Aurel> crweb, ok...
[15:48] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: but i'm pertty certian that they can never be equal. They are just pointers, 2 instances would have 2 different addresses. Unless they contained the same exect instance of an object, they could never be equal
[15:49] <Dark_Aurel> boost::function< void (int) > f1(boost::bind(&A::f, &a, _1));
[15:49] <Dark_Aurel> boost::function< void (int) > f2(boost::bind(&B::f, &b, _1));
[15:49] <Dark_Aurel> boost::function< void (int) > f3(boost::bind(&B::f, &b, _1));
[15:49] <Dark_Aurel> In this example f2 == f3.
[15:49] <crweb> no it doesn't
[15:49] <Dark_Aurel> Why?
[15:49] <crweb> f2 and f3 are not the same
[15:50] <Dark_Aurel> They call absolutely identacal functors.
[15:50] <crweb> f2 != f3 because f2 is a pointer at address x and f3 is a pointer to address y
[15:50] <crweb> there would have to be a compair fucntion. f3.compare(f2)
[15:51] <crweb> compare
[15:52] <Dark_Aurel> crweb, why f2 pointer to address different to f3? You mean that f2 points to different instance of functor-object made by bind?
[15:52] <crweb> f2 is a pointer right?
[15:52] <crweb> pointers have addresses
[15:52] <Dark_Aurel> f2 is instance of boost::function<void (int)> class
[15:52] <Dark_Aurel> but why (f2 == bind(boost::bind(&B::f, &b, _1))) returns true?
[15:53] <crweb> f2 = 0x8888, *f2 = data points to.
[15:53] <crweb> *f2 == *f3 might work
[15:53] <crweb> but f2 != f3
[15:53] <crweb> thats pointer comparison
[15:53] <crweb> f2 is a pointer to an instance
[15:54] <crweb> according tot he doc
[15:54] <Dark_Aurel> thinking....
[15:55] <crweb> pointer to a function pointer
[15:55] <Dark_Aurel> there is a operator==() to compare boost::function with any functor.
[15:55] <shirour> nerochiaro?
[15:56] <crweb> thats because f2 == 0 (NULL)
[15:56] <crweb> means it is empty
[15:56] <nerochiaro> shirour: the driver was just built, i need to try it
[15:56] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: the major detail you are missing i think is that f2 is a pointer, not an instance
[15:57] <crweb> f2 and f3 are not the same address
[15:57] <crweb> they might point to the same address
[15:57] <shirour> nerochiaro: good
[15:57] <nerochiaro> crweb: do you remember what is the default kernel config file we use ?
[15:57] <crweb> nerochiaro: arch/arm/ntosd-dm320_defconfig
[15:58] <nerochiaro> ah thanks
[15:58] <crweb> something like that
[15:58] <crweb> I'm out of battery, i'll be back
[15:59] <Dark_Aurel> crweb, why do you think f2 is pointer?...
[16:00] <shirour> nerochiaro: any luck?
[16:00] <nerochiaro> shirour: still working on it, sorry
[16:00] <crweb> Dark_Aurel: cause i read somewhere in there that it was: www.boost.org
[16:01] <crweb> I'll be back in a few
[16:01] <nerochiaro> shirour: on the device you have it on /lib/modules/2.6.15/kernel/drivers/video ?
[16:02] <shirour> i don't think you need that
[16:02] <nerochiaro> no, i know
[16:02] <nerochiaro> i was just asking
[16:02] <shirour> yeah
[16:04] <nerochiaro> i need some quick program to test it, osdmain won't work because it uses some ioctls that are specific of the other driver
[16:04] <shirour> one sec
[16:05] <shirour> nerochiaro - pastebin.ca
[16:07] <nerochiaro> shirour: looking at ti
[16:11] <nerochiaro> shirour: what should that program do ?
[16:20] <shirour> draw a rect on the screen
[16:21] <shirour> does it work?
[16:21] <nerochiaro> no, it draws nothing
[16:22] <shirour> what does it print in the console?
[16:23] <nerochiaro> The framebuffer device was opened successfully.
[16:23] <nerochiaro> 480x640, 16bpp
[16:23] <nerochiaro> The framebuffer device was mapped to memory successfully.
[16:23] <nerochiaro> but nothing is drawn
[16:23] <nerochiaro> maybe i just need to turn the fb on
[16:23] <nerochiaro> but i don't remember the ioctl command
[16:24] <shirour> oh... sorry, can't help you with that... we don't have the same hardware
[16:24] <shirour> but it looks as if it wrote the data to the fb...
[16:24] <nerochiaro> yes, i'll figure that out, it seems a good starting point
[16:24] <shirour> ok
[16:24] <shirour> good luck..!
[16:24] <shirour> bye
[16:25] <nerochiaro> shirour: thanks a lot
[16:25] <shirour> np
[16:33] <nerochiaro> damn, something is wrong with that driver. if i run the same test program with the itfb driver it works, so it's not some missing ioctl call. it's some call to hardware inside the driver itself
[16:33] <nerochiaro> that's missing
[16:34] <nerochiaro> oh well, i need sleep for now
[17:16] <JoeyBorn> yeah, this coolmax thing is fairly offensive
[20:50] <dotslashlycos> crweb: I was having some trouble getting an internet connection with the VM - I ended up having to change eth0 to eth1 in /etc/network/interfaces
[20:51] <dotslashlycos> crweb: and fwi, the VM works fine under the beta version of VMware Fusion on my mac
[20:54] <JoeyBorn> hi all
[20:55] <JoeyBorn> hi hellwolf, how's it going?
[20:57] <hellwolf> JoeyBorn, hi, I've received the box. Thanks. And I feel so family with it since it's also a arm9 based machine. I'm trying to porting something on it :)
[20:57] <JoeyBorn> what are you going to port?
[21:00] <hellwolf> My build system and package system. But before this I maybe also be to get family with existing stuff. But since I just received yesterday, so I can't tell more.
[21:01] <crweb> dotslashlycos: the value of eth* would depend on how your vmware is setup
[21:02] <crweb> dotslashlycos: if you have 2 network devices specified in vmware, then you might have to select the 2nd interface
[21:02] <dotslashlycos> crweb: allright - thanks
[21:02] <crweb> hellwolf: familiar
[21:03]