[02:22] <gremlin[it]> morning all
[04:51] <orion-uk_> Morning all :)
[07:46] <orion-uk_> MattJ: (no rush, just drop me then command when u get 2 sec thanx) what was the command to ceate bookmarks dir? folder gone now! cheers :)
[07:46] <MattJ> mkdir /media/bookmark
[07:46] <MattJ> I think it will disappear each reboot
[07:46] <MattJ> But it is there always on newer firmware
[07:46] <MattJ> No idea about AZ though
[07:47] <orion-uk_> cool...thanx, wont disturb u but thanx...
[07:47] <orion-uk_> mm thought i had latest fw!
[07:47] <orion-uk_> thanx buddy
[07:47] <orion-uk_> :)
[07:47] <MattJ> I'm running a beta, so it could be only in that
[07:47] <MattJ> I'm using an old beta, too scared to upgrade in case something breaks :)
[07:48] <orion-uk_> 3.33-1.73-04.81t
[07:48] <orion-uk_> lol... know the feeling...anyways, dont wanna keep stopping u from ur work ;-)
[07:49] <orion-uk_> btw, AZ?
[07:49] <MattJ> The Qt GUI firmware
[07:49] <orion-uk_> ioc..lol
[07:49] <MattJ> Work? It's my birthday today \o/
[07:49] <orion-uk_> ty m8
[07:50] <orion-uk_> HAPPY BIRTHDAY :-> ...(im not singing 4 yah tough)..lol
[07:50] <MattJ> :D
[07:50] <orion-uk_> dont burn yah lips on those candlews ;-}
[07:50] <vmarks> hello folks.
[07:50] <vmarks> where's the new qt firmware?
[07:50] <orion-uk_> hay vmarks :)
[07:51] <MattJ> vmarks: In SVN afaik
[07:51] <MattJ> *Only in
[07:51] <orion-uk_> hopes MattJ gets a new gadget 4 his B-day :)
[07:51] <MattJ> lol
[07:53] <vmarks> no! new gadgets will distract from osd!
[07:53] <vmarks> no new gadgets!
[07:53] * vmarks  looks MattJ in a closet with his code.
[07:53] <vmarks> locks.
[07:53] <MattJ> :D
[07:53] <orion-uk_> rotflmao...guess ur right there vmarks...what WAS i thinking!..lol
[07:53] <orion-uk_> :0
[07:54] <MattJ> I don't know what new gadget I need, since I have an OSD :)
[07:55] <vmarks> ipod touch, to control wooble.
[07:55] <vmarks> thats what he should get.
[07:55] <orion-uk_> :-> mmmm..thinks hard..
[07:56] <orion-uk_> nope...nothing springs 2 mind... would settle 4 a new wide screen hd tv :)
[07:56] <orion-uk_> (2 compliment OSD, ofcourse) ;->
[07:56] <MattJ> lol
[07:58] <orion-uk_> well.. im off 2 get some lunch... my wife says between the time i get up and sit in from of my screen and 14 hours later when i go to bed! i should eat! ..g..what a waste of seconds that is!..lol
[07:59] <orion-uk_> gonna raid the fridge, l8trs ppl :)
[08:01] <MattJ> :D
[08:01] <MattJ> Bye
[08:01] <orion-uk_> l8trz :)
[08:30] <gremlin[it]> someone here play/admin the wiki @ neurostechnology ?
[08:32] <gremlin[it]> i create a new page 'OpenEmbedded' to report my work, fell free to link it from where is more appropriate
[08:57] <gremlin[it]> fell -> feel
[09:31] <JohnDesigner> ATTENTION all devs
[09:31] <gremlin[it]> hi JohnDesigner
[09:32] <JohnDesigner> Would you be okay with the Serial port being a 2.5mm jack (same as current OSD HW)
[09:32] <JohnDesigner> ?
[09:33] <JohnDesigner> hiya gremlin[it]
[09:33] <gremlin[it]> is not so bad ...
[09:33] <gremlin[it]> and isn't also too difficult to do by hand ....
[09:33] <gremlin[it]> not too difficult
[09:33] <gremlin[it]> are u planning to change it?
[09:34] <JohnDesigner> we are specifying the new hardware and I do NOT want a standard DB-9 connector
[09:34] <gremlin[it]> me to !
[09:34] <JohnDesigner> it takes up over 4x the space
[09:34] <gremlin[it]> in fact !
[09:34] <JohnDesigner> and just plain looks old
[09:34] <JohnDesigner> looks like old tech
[09:34] <gremlin[it]> yes!
[09:35] * JohnDesigner  sees that gremlin[it] is pickin up what I am puttin dowm
[09:35] <JohnDesigner> err,down
[09:36] <gremlin[it]> only thing isn't good for me is the power connector ... at least mine s too "weak" it slide off too easily :(
[09:38] <gremlin[it]> i 100% on your line about serial connector ...
[09:39] <JohnDesigner> the power plug will be the standard 2-prong
[09:39] <JohnDesigner> not the plug the OSD uses. This HW is dvd-player sized.
[09:41] <gremlin[it]> for me is good also the current one ... just use one from a different supplier :)
[09:41] <gremlin[it]> ahhhh ... bigger ... can u tell us something ?
[09:42] <gremlin[it]> can i have one in preview ?!?!? :D
[09:43] <MattJ> +1 about the serial port
[09:43] <MattJ> I like it the way it is
[09:43] <MattJ> +1 about the power supply
[09:44] <MattJ> The phono jack that goes into the back of the OSD, it literally disconnects if I so much as move the OSD 1cm
[09:45] <MattJ> It causes pain when unplugging the ethernet cable, or pushing in a memory card
[09:45] <vmarks> JohnDesigner, by two prong, do you mean, figure 8 cord?
[09:45] <JohnDesigner> vmarks: yes
[09:45] <vmarks> thank you.
[09:45] <vmarks> why not the IEC kettle cord?
[09:45] <vmarks> size?
[09:46] <vmarks> it's what the chinese have on hand?
[09:46] <vmarks> ;)
[09:47] <vmarks> ok, the only reason people use db-9 on pro equipment is to do remote control signalling between high end gear.
[09:47] <vmarks> if that's not an OSD intention, then either don't have the connector, or don't expose it on the outside (you must pull covers if you want this port) -- populate it on the board standing vertical instead of 90 degrees.
[09:47] <JohnDesigner> the 3-prong plug was originally speced, but I objected on the basis that it "just seems big and computer-related" instead of an entertainment device related
[09:48] <vmarks> JohnDesigner, that's a faulty objection.
[09:48] <JohnDesigner> perception of quality related in a round about sort of way
[09:48] <vmarks> let's talk about that
[09:48] <vmarks> except that the IEC connector is a higher quality.
[09:48] <MattJ> I assume that being unlucky I just got a bad transformer with a bad phono jack? :)
[09:49] <vmarks> and it's a standard cable that everyone has.
[09:49] <vmarks> figure eight is also mostly common, but not entirely - there are a few variants that are incompatible (one side of the figure eight is square, etc.)
[09:49] <vmarks> also, the IEC has ground.
[09:50] <JohnDesigner> from the previous discussions, kettle cord does give you grounding over 2-prong, but grounding can be done internally
[09:50] <vmarks> true.
[09:50] <vmarks> actually, internal grounding is probably more desirable anyway.
[09:50] <JohnDesigner> but, the kettle cord plug and diameter is larger.
[09:50] <vmarks> don't have to fool with people who have old outlets, etc.
[09:50] <vmarks> in the new enclosure, is size really at a premium?
[09:51] <JohnDesigner> not on the enclosure, but pulling a relatively hefty cable out of the box seems unsavory to me.
[09:52] <vmarks> In any event, I'm not that hung up on this one, but I think it's a mistake to connect either one to an impression of 'quality' - there are IEC cables that are sleek and flexible, and don't have the bulk annoyance you're thinking of.
[09:52] <JohnDesigner> not that this matters a great deal, but Tivo and aTV both use 2-prong
[09:52] <vmarks> yes, they do.
[09:52] <vmarks> so, either way.
[09:52] <vmarks> but in aTV, they're trying to make size a premium.
[09:52] <JohnDesigner> DVD players (the ones I have anyway) use 2-prong
[09:52] <vmarks> an IEC is higher than the whole device.
[09:52] <JohnDesigner> but tivo does not use size at a premium
[09:53] <JohnDesigner> they ground fromt he inside iirc.
[09:53] <vmarks> yeah, but they've made a series of bad enclosure design choices.
[09:53] <vmarks> their interface behavior is great. but don't take cues from them on enclosure.
[09:54] <vmarks> anyway, next topic?
[09:54] * vmarks  doesn't make an issue of this.
[09:54] <JohnDesigner> as is mentioned "not that it matters a great deal"
[09:54] <JohnDesigner> So, the whole issue boiled down to the unboxing and assembly experience as it relates to perceived quality (to a non-geek primarily)
[09:56] <JohnDesigner> the ID is intending to be 'sleek and sexy', but has this husky plug with a relatively unruly cord.
[09:56] <JohnDesigner> these are minor things I would agree.
[09:57] <JohnDesigner> I'm just trying to keep the overall perception of quality on the 'scoresheet' wherever possible.
[09:58] <vmarks> so, is the figure eight cable flat?
[09:58] <vmarks> thank you for that.
[09:59] <vmarks> the best thing is to handle the cables and decide in the dark.
[09:59] <JohnDesigner> MattJ: the unit moving when interacting with it (inserting cards, etc) will not be an issue with the new HW
[10:00] <JohnDesigner> vmarks: I hope it will be flat. and not have the inset line running down the axis like a lamp cord.
[10:01] <JohnDesigner> as reference, I think the aTV's power cord was +1 in an unexpected area
[10:01] <JohnDesigner> but that smooth type cord may be too expensive for us.
[10:01] <JohnDesigner> I don't know yet
[10:01] <MattJ> JohnDesigner: Good
[10:02] <MattJ> But is the power cord issue known, or is it just my unit?
[10:03] <JohnDesigner> MattJ: the power cord slipping is not without precedent.
[10:04] <JohnDesigner> two issues there
[10:04] <JohnDesigner> one, the jack is set back just a leeeetle to far from the housings outer face
[10:04] <JohnDesigner> two, sometimes the friction tab in the jack can bend a little.
[10:05] <MattJ> Yeah, wiggling the cord will make the OSD reboot
[10:05] <MattJ> Even though it doesn't visibly pull away from the socket
[10:06] <JohnDesigner> MattJ: if you want to fix that for good, get out a dremel tool and remove the plastic face around the hole
[10:07] <MattJ> lol, now why didn't I think of that?:)
[10:07] <JohnDesigner> well, you had no way of knowing that the plug is not bottoming out all the way into the jack due to the housing
[10:08] <JohnDesigner> bc it feels like it is bottoming out (but really the plug is just hitting the housing, not bottoming out into the jack)
[10:18] <JohnDesigner> MattJ: Can you easily find a 2.5mm (headphone size) serial cable?
[10:19] <MattJ> No idea, I only have the one that came with the OSD
[10:20] <JohnDesigner> see, the main functional sticking point for serial being either DB-9 or 2.5mm is whether Neuros supplys the cable or not
[10:20] <MattJ> I can see why they wouldn't
[10:21] <JohnDesigner> If a DB-9 is used, then no cable is supplied (thinking that a standard cable of this type is readily available)
[10:21] <MattJ> The current OSD lists it as a way to control external tuners, but I don't think that is possible atm, is it?
[10:21] <JohnDesigner> but you need to buy it
[10:21] <JohnDesigner> MattJ: no clue on that
[10:43] <JohnDesigner> Hi JoeBorn
[10:43] <JoeBorn> JohnDesigner: how goes it?
[10:43] <JohnDesigner> JoeBorn: pretty well
[10:43] <JohnDesigner> and you?
[10:44] <vmarks> hi JoeBorn !
[10:44] <vmarks> welcome back!
[10:44] <JohnDesigner> JoeBorn: ATM, I am grunbling over seeing a male DB-9 serial connector in the spec
[10:44] <vmarks> JoeBorn, my vote was to populate it but put it vertically inside the enclosure, so people who want to use it have to go for it.
[10:45] <JohnDesigner> and now trying to build a case (for the third time) to use a 2.5mm jack for serial
[10:45] <vmarks> rather than a 90 degree with cutout on the back.
[10:46] <JohnDesigner> vmarks: was that your vote? i missed that
[10:46] <vmarks> that was my vote.
[10:46] <vmarks> it came right after we were talking about power cables.
[10:47] <JoeBorn> well I think we'll have a heck of a time just fitting in the must have connectors.
[10:47] * JohnDesigner  laments the fact he needs to look at the keybord to type, misses things
[10:47] <vmarks> use the real db-9, mount it on the board inside the enclosure, people who need it can pull covers.
[10:47] <vmarks> most people won't, save the pennies cost on the 2.5mm to db-9 patch cable, etc.
[10:47] <JohnDesigner> vmarks: yeah, but that cosomization will not realiticlaly happen
[10:47] <JohnDesigner> err, customization
[10:48] <JoeBorn> vmarks: it's not a bad idea (assuming we can fit that connector inside.
[10:48] <vmarks> hey, I'm just some guy talking aloud :)
[10:48] <JoeBorn> but anyway, I'm sure we won't have room for an external DB9 or whatver.
[10:48] <JohnDesigner> vmarks: true, sorry I blew up like that ;)
[10:49] <JohnDesigner> JoeBorn: we do have room for a DB-9 technically IF the proportions stay the same
[10:50] <vmarks> JohnDesigner, I didn't think you blew up. We're all just talking.
[10:50] <JohnDesigner> JoeBorn: but the DB-9 will be the largest connector on the board, and add 1" to the length as compared to a 2.5mm jack
[10:50] <JoeBorn> JohnDesigner: well I think we're going to have to go with a smaller extruded case
[10:50] <JoeBorn> ala external hard drive.
[10:51] <JohnDesigner> vmarks: ya, I'm just joking, but have a hard time expressing that in type sometimes ;)
[10:52] <JohnDesigner> JoeBorn: Hmm, I don't get a warm fuzzy about an extrusion for this HW
[10:52] <JoeBorn> JohnDesigner: perhaps you should try having more whiskey?
[10:52] <gremlin[it]> JoeBorn, hi !
[10:53] <gremlin[it]> JoeBorn, take a look wiki.neurostechnology.com
[10:53] <JoeBorn> perhaps that will help with the warmth and fuzziness, both
[10:53] <JoeBorn> gremlin[it]: will do.
[10:53] <JohnDesigner> no expertise in extrusions, Steel is heavy, aluminum is expensive, both will require a costly amount of after machining
[10:54] <JoeBorn> JohnDesigner: yeah, well the external hard drive ones are pretty cheap
[10:54] <JoeBorn> can we use pig iron?
[10:55] <JohnDesigner> that oringinal extruded design (where the front and back are open) is the only way I can see an extrusion working out okay. But that part is heavy and expensive.
[10:55] <JoeBorn> jimmychen: hello
[10:55] <JohnDesigner> JoeBorn: what extruded external HDD housings do you have as reference?
[10:55] <JoeBorn> JohnDesigner: well, we're ditching the second hdd
[10:56] <jimmychen> Joeborn: hello.
[10:56] <JoeBorn> JohnDesigner: well I just have quotes from a couple of the ext hdd mfg
[10:56] <JohnDesigner> JoeBorn: ya, but that does not buy as much space as you might think. Well, one HDD will eliminate maybe 2" from the depth
[10:57] <JoeBorn> really?
[10:58] <JoeBorn> what's taking up so much space vis a vis an external hdd?
[10:58] <JohnDesigner> that is assuming the unit still wants to be stackable with DVDplayers and VCRs
[10:59] <JoeBorn> JohnDesigner: no, I think we've ditched that constraint just out of necessity.
[10:59] <JoeBorn> but actually no decisions on anything has been made
[10:59] <JoeBorn> we need to talk about all that.
[11:00] <JohnDesigner> Or, if we go the "kinda small as possible" route, the biggest x/y/z component is the power supply.
[11:01] <JoeBorn> yeah, the power supply.
[11:01] <JohnDesigner> and its related needs of cord space and distances internally. Unless a non-plasitc-housing PS is used.
[11:02] <JoeBorn> right, that's a good issue.
[11:02] <jimmychen> JoeBorn: If there anywhere i could put my own application on Neuros WIKI ? I hope someone that take interest on it could join in.
[11:02] <jimmychen> JoeBorn: something similiar to sourceforge.net.
[11:03] <JoeBorn> an application for the OSD?
[11:03] <jimmychen> JoeBorn: ya. i had port Bit torrent on osd.
[11:03] <jimmychen> JoeBorn: but still on the early stage, console interface only.
[11:04] <JoeBorn> sure you can put it on the wiki
[11:04] <JohnDesigner> JoeBorn: if you are so inclined, you can open the 3d eDrawing I sent you, hide the housings, and pull around the components to get a rule of thumb idea of spacing.
[11:04] <JoeBorn> just make sure that BT doesn't link to any of the illicit search engines
[11:05] <JoeBorn> gremlin[it]: I'm reading about OE
[11:06] <gremlin[it]> JoeBorn, i just create the page but isn't linkged from enywhere ... someone who play/admin the wiki will put on the right place
[11:07] <gremlin[it]> JoeBorn, if (as i hope) be able to make it play video i'll carry my neuros at FOSDEM with me :)
[11:07] <JoeBorn> jimmychen: add the link to wiki.neurostechnology.com
[11:07] <JohnDesigner> gremlin[it]: did you see my suggestion to MattJ earlier about how to fix your power cord issue?
[11:07] <gremlin[it]> no sorry JohnDesigner ...
[11:07] <JoeBorn> FOSDEM?
[11:07] <MattJ> FOSDEM!
[11:07] * MattJ  will be there
[11:07] <gremlin[it]> free opensource developer european meeting
[11:08] <gremlin[it]> i'll be there as OpenEmbedded staff ;)
[11:08] <gremlin[it]> MattJ, goo so we'll meet !
[11:08] <JoeBorn> ok, all, I have to attend my nephews birthday party
[11:08] <MattJ> gremlin[it]: You'll probably find me with the Jabber/XMPP guys :)
[11:08] <MattJ> bb JoeBorn
[11:09] <jimmychen> JoeBorn: got it .
[11:10] <JohnDesigner> gremlin[it]: Basically, take a dremel tool or similar, and cut away the plastic around the power jack.
[11:10] <JohnDesigner> gremlin[it]: then your power plug will fully insert and should be solid
[11:11] <gremlin[it]> ah ok thank JohnDesigner
[11:11] <JohnDesigner> gremlin[it]: as JoeBorn suggests, have some whiskey first to calm your nerves
[11:11] <gremlin[it]> uhhh why i have to calm down ?
[11:12] <JohnDesigner> gremlin[it]: in case using a tool that spins at 10,000 rpm on your beloved Neuros OSD is nerve wracking
[11:13] <vmarks> listen. the proper procedure is this: drink 100 cups of coffee.
[11:13] <vmarks> hold the dremel in its off position.
[11:13] <gremlin[it]> hahahah
[11:13] <vmarks> your hand will move at 10k rpm due to the jitters
[11:13] <vmarks> you'll go right through the case.
[11:13] <vmarks> :)
[11:14] <JohnDesigner> all good ideas also!
[11:15] <vmarks> you know, the other option is to take a pocketknife and shave the plastic around the barrel connector on the power tip down a little.
[11:16] <vmarks> that's probably easier.
[11:26] <gremlin[it]> JohnDesigner, mhhh have to do the operation on the OSD case or on the plug ?
[11:27] <vmarks> I say, plug.
[11:27] <vmarks> easier.
[11:27] <vmarks> you know, just remove the cover. :)
[11:27] <vmarks> covers are for frou frou pretty boys.
[11:27] <vmarks> :)
[11:27] <vmarks> real men use their hardware BARE.
[11:27] <vmarks> (note, the hardware is bare, not the men.)
[11:28] <vmarks> (that is all.)
[11:37] * JohnDesigner  notes vmarks' freudian slip
[11:37] <orion-uk_> MattJ: Re: neuros OSD feedback: forums.neurostechnology.com check it out when ur free, are these ideas pos? ;-)
[11:38] <JohnDesigner> gremlin[it]: I do not know the exact contents of the plug, so stripping the rubber on the plug is up to you
[11:38] <JohnDesigner> but offhand that seems like an equally good solution
[11:40] <MattJ> orion-uk_: I believe you will see in-video bookmarks soon :)
[11:40] <MattJ> ie. play back from where you last watched to
[11:40] <MattJ> Isn't that so, JohnDesigner ?
[11:40] <orion-uk_> ;-)
[11:40] <orion-uk_> cool
[11:40] <orion-uk_> ty
[11:40] <MattJ> and about FF/RW, I would like to see a way to skip back/forwards 5min
[11:41] <orion-uk_> just as accepable :)
[11:41] <orion-uk_> btw fyi.. i have had no issues with power cable! mine sits in nice n tight!
[11:42] <MattJ> Interesting
[11:42] <MattJ> Perhaps it was worse on the earlier ones
[11:42] <orion-uk_> must b so!
[11:42] <MattJ> Oh
[11:42] <MattJ> Also
[11:42] <MattJ> I have a US one, I guess you have a UK one?
[11:43] <vmarks> they're all made in China.
[11:43] <orion-uk_> came from www.Maplins.co.uk so yah prb :)
[11:43] <MattJ> vmarks: *Everything* is made in China :)
[11:43] <vmarks> it will never snow again inside my snow globe.
[11:43] <orion-uk_> k
[11:43] <vmarks> MattJ, you weren't, were you?
[11:43] <MattJ> How would I know?
[11:43] <orion-uk_> Vmarks: aint that the truth..lol
[11:48] <orion-uk_> Mattj: was just thinking, if u gotta scrub 5min alot, (playback issues) where as if you move along the timeline (without showing fromes) then it plays from the time you stop at, would that have a better effect (or mot make much diff?)
[11:49] <MattJ> I don't think either would be different
[11:49] <MattJ> You have to do the same in each case
[11:49] <MattJ> Except with forward/back 5min the skip time is fixed
[11:49] <MattJ> You have sync problem with ff/rw?
[11:49] <orion-uk_> oh, ok, was not sure if it would be a dif process.. noob n all ;->
[11:50] <orion-uk_> yah.. if i go more than 8x-16x the movie starts to go outta sync.. does it even if i dont ff/rwd tbh, but ff/rwd makes it alot worse!
[11:51] <MattJ> Odd
[11:51] <MattJ> Never seen that :)
[11:52] <orion-uk_> could it be codec prob in the films ? (its on ones i have on my puta and transfer to OSD mainly but does happen with OSD recording aswell.
[11:53] <orion-uk_> movies some times do that kung fu thing on me..lol
[11:53] <vmarks> what format?
[11:53] <vmarks> avi divx?
[11:53] <vmarks> mp4?
[11:53] <orion-uk_> xvid, divx, ffdshow etc
[11:53] <JohnDesigner> MattJ, orion-uk_ , yes, 'Resume' video from last watched position is planned for implementation soon. In-video bookmarks work now
[11:53] <MattJ> Great
[11:54] <MattJ> They were in but broken for quite some time
[11:54] <orion-uk_> jhondesigner: cool..ty.. can i save bookmarks..they seem to go when i stop the film!
[11:54] <JohnDesigner> MattJ: and to your request, a "jumpcode" feature is planned also. That means you could "jump to a specific place in the timecode"
[11:55] <JohnDesigner> orion-uk_: ya, the fact that the bookmarks diaapear after closing the video is a bug
[11:55] <JohnDesigner> being worked on
[11:56] <MattJ> JohnDesigner: Perfect!
[11:56] <JohnDesigner> MattJ: an undocumented feature, press a remote key to jump forward 30 seconds
[11:56] <JohnDesigner> it works now.
[11:56] <orion-uk_> i use tunebite to convert mostly, could it be error in conversion (for ones i have on puta?) but as for OSD recording going outa sync, no idea!
[11:57] <orion-uk_> Jhondesigner: k, ;-) cool, ty.
[11:57] <JohnDesigner> you are welcome ;)
[11:58] <JohnDesigner> hmm, what key was that 30 second skip. I think its the * key
[11:58] <JohnDesigner> or maybe # key. one of those iirc
[12:00] * MattJ  tries
[12:02] <orion-uk_> # works for me :)
[12:02] <JohnDesigner> then that is the one
[12:02] <orion-uk_> ;)
[12:03] <JohnDesigner> now I remember...I made it that key bc it was on the right (to go along with a mental image of advancing the playhead on a horizontally linnear timecode meter)
[12:04] <JohnDesigner> and the * and # seem like 'variable' type keys
[12:04] <MattJ> :o
[12:04] <MattJ> #
[12:04] <MattJ> It works
[12:04] * MattJ  thanks JohnDesigner 30 times
[12:04] <JohnDesigner> hoora!
[12:04] <JohnDesigner> np, you're welcome
[12:04] <MattJ> FF/RW through 2.5hr recordings is a complete pain
[12:05] <JohnDesigner> agreed. but you do have 16x FF right? Does that still work on OTRFU?
[12:05] <JohnDesigner> err, TORFU SW
[12:05] <MattJ> It does
[12:05] <orion-uk_> il go with that also :) seems 8x is faster than 16x at times!..lol
[12:05] <MattJ> But it is still far too slow
[12:06] <orion-uk_> 2nd that, sorry :)
[12:07] <JohnDesigner> ya, actually, i think that 16x is not strictly accurate (may even be way off as your experiences would indicate)
[12:07] <JohnDesigner> iirc, there is a bug for that too.
[12:08] <orion-uk_> 16x "seems" 2 go @ a crawl at times!
[12:08] <orion-uk_> k
[12:08] <JohnDesigner> step one of fixing that bug is change the method in SW to be accurate, rather than a rough estimation
[12:09] <orion-uk_> k
[12:09] <orion-uk_> well, im off.. stuff 2 do (time i left the pros to do thier thing) ;-) thanx all
[12:09] <orion-uk_> :-)
[12:09] <orion-uk_> tc all...l8trz.
[12:09] <JohnDesigner> the details are sketchy to me, but I think the current method just skips X number of frames
[12:10] <JohnDesigner> later orion-uk_
[12:10] <orion-uk_> JohneDesigner: yep.. cheers :)
[12:26] <MattJ> The OSD needs to be here: www.schedulesdirect.org
[12:26] <vmarks> the OSD could be there.
[12:26] <MattJ> Indeed
[12:26] <vmarks> but it does not need to be.
[12:26] <MattJ> It does
[12:27] <vmarks> no, it doesn't.
[12:27] <MattJ> Yes, it does
[12:27] <TobiasFar> MattJ: it doesn't
[12:27] <vmarks>